Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2020 at 12:51 pm in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6334iasmaaParticipant
Thank you so much for your help.
November 9, 2020 at 12:24 pm in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6332iasmaaParticipantThank you for this.
If you did not generate your filler items using a Template but still used something like .log( “CQcorrect” , row.CQcorrect ) on your filler trial, then you got NAs because there is simply no row for row to point to.
^ so how to fix that?
This is basically the same problem: TextInput2 is only defined for trial #1, so you need to adapt the code to that. Also, you have two lines for TextInput2 for every participant, you only want to keep the second one, the one for which Parameter is Final.
^ I adapted the code and got an empty data frame!
Appreciate your help.
November 4, 2020 at 5:24 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6309iasmaaParticipantMany thanks to this.
-I moved (whichtense) also for the fillers MC following the same codes and it works fine. but they still have NA for the three columns CQcorrect, RQcorrect, MCcorrect although I set that in my pcibex script.
-I also moved choose(for nationality) and choose2 (for English level) and that worked in the correct_which_results but appear with NA in the main tmp ! I do not really know why!
I tried also to have a column of the groups which defined by the PennElementName (TextInput2) but I got this message:
Error: Each row of output must be identified by a unique combination of keys.
Keys are shared for 144 rows:
Although I deleted row number 10 because it has the same name (TextInput2) of row 11, but that did not solve the problem.Sorry I feel that become more into R area instead of pcibex but I would appreciate your help in that.
November 3, 2020 at 3:56 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6295iasmaaParticipantSorry but I figured out something and I just want you to have a clear picture of this.
The answers of the three questions that appear in the columns CQ, RQ, CM are the right answers written by me in the tamplate. However, the other three lines under (that disappear after we keep only the dashed lines) are the participants answers and I need both the right answers and the participants answer to show when keeping the dashed lines columns.
These are the three line I’m talking about:
Sorry to make it too complicated.
November 3, 2020 at 3:32 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6294iasmaaParticipantI think I know now why it recorded the RQ as yes/no question. I did that in my tamplate in correct2 column and logged it at the end of the trial .log( “RQcorrect” , row.Correct2)
I logged the scale answer too, but not at the end of the trial. So now I have it in my results but when we exclude all other lines and keep the dashed lines only, the scale answers disappear of course
November 3, 2020 at 2:53 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6293iasmaaParticipantHi,
Thank you so much for your effort! I really appreciate your help.
The results look much more tidy now. However, there are still some remaining issue occur:– The RQ is actually the rating question that consists of a scale of 4. So, the content of RQ should be numbers 1,2,3,4
I do not really know why it takes it as yes/no answer question! although I have only one yes/no question, which is the CQ.
However, the answers of the RQ exist in a later columns under the dashed sentence (it is clearly shown in the results file).
So I think because we kept the dashed sentences lines only, we lost the RQ number answers. How to get them back and include them in the RQ column?I also noticed that the filler items (which include other tenses than just articles) do not have answers for all the three questions (the CQ that needs to be answered by Yes/No, the RQ that takes a scale of 4, and the MC which takes an article), but takes NA instead?
It also give a group name (C) to all items which is not true because I have 5 groups presenting the five conditions I have (A,B,C,D,E)
Thank you.
October 31, 2020 at 6:38 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6281iasmaaParticipantHi,
Target item: (in pcibex results file)
1596973404,MD5HASH_EDITED,PennController,17,0,trials,NULL,Controller-DashedSentence,DashedSentence,1,For,1596972359450,For example the_dodo_birds are extinct. ,No,No,No_article,C,465,false,For example the_dodo_birds are extinct. ,Any addtional parameters were appended as additional columns
Target item (As csv):
Filler item: (in pcibex results file)
1596973404,MD5HASH_EDITED,PennController,30,0,trials,NULL,Controller-DashedSentence,DashedSentence,1,But,1596972504366,458,false,But Bill sold used cars for twenty years.,Any addtional parameters were appended as additional columns
filler item (As csv):
- This reply was modified 4 years ago by Jeremy. Reason: Anonymized MD5 hash
October 30, 2020 at 5:46 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6274iasmaaParticipantHi,
No I already separated them by comma when import the csv file into R. but I copied the example from the original text results to make it clear.
Is there any way to insert a picture here to show you exactly how my results look like?October 29, 2020 at 3:56 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6269iasmaaParticipanttarget:
1596973404 MD5HASH_EDITED PennController 11 0 trials NULL Controller-DashedSentence DashedSentence 1 For 1.59697E+12 For example yellow_chair is very attractive. No No A C 792 FALSE For example yellow_chair is very attractive. Any addtional parameters were appended as additional columns
(the second line starts with No……etc. so it comes in the same first column in the cell under the first value (1596973404)
filler:
1596973404 MD5HASH_EDITED PennController 39 0 trials NULL Controller-DashedSentence DashedSentence 1 So 1.59697E+12 442 FALSE So after Kevin came in Audrey sings a song. Any addtional parameters were appended as additional columns
Here, FALSE comes in the second line (under the first value), So after Kevin came in Audrey sings a song (in the second column)…etc
Hope it is clear.
- This reply was modified 4 years ago by Jeremy. Reason: Replaced MD5 hash for full anonymity
October 28, 2020 at 4:04 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6266iasmaaParticipantHi,
I think I have a problem with the presentation of the column in csv format.
It appears as I have 14 columns for both filler and target items, and the extra columns come under each item line!
Which make the extra columns(the ones under each items) disappear in this stage of processing: dashed_results <- subset(dashed_results, Type==”Controller-DashedSentence”)October 27, 2020 at 2:01 pm in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6263iasmaaParticipantHi,
Thank you for the clarification.
It is more clear now.I did not refer to labels when designing the experiment. So I did not identify that the template items are target and the others are filler. What to do in that case?
October 27, 2020 at 4:34 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6260iasmaaParticipantThe error I got when trying to name the long line columns:
Error in names(results222) <- c(“Controller”, “ItemN”, “ElementN”, “Label”, :
‘names’ attribute [16] must be the same length as the vector [14]as seen above, I changed (dashed results) with the name of my CSV file (results222) because it only works that way.
October 27, 2020 at 4:23 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6259iasmaaParticipantHi,
Thank you for this.
That doesn’t work with me. I always got the error(object not found!).I tried to replace the (dashed_results) you used with (dashed_sentence) and the extras with my 5 extras but it still not working!
October 26, 2020 at 1:55 am in reply to: reaction time results appear in different two columns #6252iasmaaParticipantHi,
Thank you for your replay.
Yes I would appreciate your help in that…iasmaaParticipantAll good now.
Thank you so much for your help.
-
AuthorPosts