Chloris

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Repetitive records BUT different results #10648
    Chloris
    Participant

    Thanks for providing the latest tutorial! I referred to this tutorial https://www.linguisticsociety.org/sites/default/files/PCIbex_Tutorial%5B2%5D.pdf when writing R codes…

    Could you suggest a more unequivocal way of calculating the RTs?

    Many thanks,
    Chloris

    in reply to: Repetitive records BUT different results #10647
    Chloris
    Participant

    The same problem also occurred in my other experiment:
    https://farm.pcibex.net/r/Iwjgkg/

    It happened to fr24, still not very frequent – only once, but perplexing.

    in reply to: Repetitive records BUT different results #10644
    Chloris
    Participant

    Hi Jeremy,

    Thanks a lot for your reply! My experiment asked participants to rate French words according to certain criteria. I got the table by selecting relevant columns and then selecting certain words (rows) in R:

    # select and rename relevant columns
    tidied_val <- results_val %>%
      filter(Parameter == "Choice" | Value == "Start") %>%
      select(ID, group, entry, Label, Parameter, PennElementName, Value, EventTime, word_id) %>%
      group_by(group, ID, entry) %>%
      mutate(RT = (mean(EventTime[Parameter=="Choice"] - EventTime[Value=="Start"]))/10)  %>%
      ungroup() %>%
      filter(Parameter == "Choice")  %>%
      select(ID, group, Value, entry, RT, Label, word_id) %>%
      rename(score = Value)
    
    # quality check (valence)
    quality_val <- tidied_val %>%
      filter(entry == "amour"| 
               entry == "espoir"| 
               entry == "haine"| 
               entry == "peur"| 
               entry == "tristesse"| 
               entry == "fer"| 
               entry == "sandwich"| 
               
               entry == "cauchemar"|
               entry =="douleur"| 
               entry =="rire"|
               entry =="passion"|
               entry =="jalousie"|
               entry == "racisme"| 
               entry == "anxiété"| 
               entry == "dent"| 
               
               entry == "plaisir"| 
               entry == "souffrance"| 
               entry == "colère"| 
               entry == "désagréable"| 
               entry == "bonheur"|
               entry == "richesse"| 
               entry == "poire"| 
               entry == "moyen"| 
             
               entry == "horreur"| 
               entry == "mensonge"| 
               entry == "confort"| 
               entry == "victoire"|
               entry == "diable"|
               entry == "chagrin"|
               entry == "vertu" |
               entry == "appareil") %>%
      group_by(ID)
    
    
    readr::write_excel_csv(quality_val, "quality_val.csv") 

    The ID variable was acquired by asking participants to enter it by themselves. I thought about whether it might be two different participants, on of whom accidentally put the wrong ID. But why would the two records have the same response time in that case?

    May I know what you referred when saying “MD5 hash”? I’m wondering how to distinguish which four records belonged to that single participant…

    Best wishes,
    Chloris

    Chloris
    Participant

    Hi Jeremy,

    Thanks for your reply. Unfortunately, I cannot set the limit on the crowd-sourcing platform since one participant may or may not complete all the experiment sections (it’s free to choose).

    I’m running into a new problem now – every time when I try to generate the results for downloading, it gets stuck at some point (e.g., “Downloading submissions (19500 rows…)”). I suppose it’s because of the big volume of data? Is there a way to fix this?

    Thanks a lot!
    Chloris

    Chloris
    Participant

    For monitoring, I meant to know if there’s a way to figure out submission times for each experiment (and ideally for each group in each experiment) without downloading the results…

    Chloris
    Participant

    Hi Jeremy,

    I indeed meant the latter one. The code works perfectly. Thanks a lot!

    Boyin

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)