Hi, Jeremy!
I see what you mean. But Now I realized the table was not formatted properly. So I will post here what I did first with two big groups/lists (between-participants)
group tipo_DP num_DP num_poss num_N_Pred id_item 1 realizado pl sg sg DPrealA1 1 realizado sg pl sg DPrealB1 1 realizado pl pl sg DPrealC1 1 realizado pl pl pl DPrealD1 1 realizado pl sg sg DPrealA2 1 realizado sg pl sg DPrealB2 1 realizado pl pl sg DPrealC2 1 realizado pl pl pl DPrealD2 1 realizado pl sg sg DPrealA3 1 realizado sg pl sg DPrealB3 1 realizado pl pl sg DPrealC3 1 realizado pl pl pl DPrealD3 1 realizado pl sg sg DPrealA4 1 realizado sg pl sg DPrealB4 1 realizado pl pl sg DPrealC4 1 realizado pl pl pl DPrealD4 2 elidido pl sg sg DPeliA1 2 elidido sg pl sg DPeliB1 2 elidido pl pl sg DPeliC1 2 elidido pl pl pl DPeliD1 2 elidido pl sg sg DPeliA2 2 elidido sg pl sg DPeliB2 2 elidido pl pl sg DPeliC2 2 elidido pl pl pl DPeliD2 2 elidido pl sg sg DPeliA3 2 elidido sg pl sg DPeliB3 2 elidido pl pl sg DPeliC3 2 elidido pl pl pl DPeliD3 2 elidido pl sg sg DPeliA4 2 elidido sg pl sg DPeliB4 2 elidido pl pl sg DPeliC4 2 elidido pl pl pl DPeliD4
I coded the items like this just to check how it would come up. This worked fine: onde participant saw 4 conditions (A, B, C, D) of tipo_DP realizado and the next participant saw 4 conditions (A, B, C, D) of tipo_DP elidido. However, I noticed that using this table, the same participant, for instance in group 1, saw, let’s say DPrealA1 and DPrealB1, which is the same stimuli but manipulated according to number marking. I should keep like this, but then I don’t know how to avoid the fact that the same participant may see DPrealA1 and DPrealB1 for instance. Is the pick function appropriate for that?
Thanks,
Ana.