Hi Chloris,
The table you include in your message presents the data after it has been transformed, so unless you provide the script or a detailed explanation of how you obtained that table, I can hardly understand how it maps to the raw results of your experiment
That being said, judging from your table, it looks like you maybe summarized the data in groups as defined by the ID column above, ie. treated the results as if all the lines referencing “fr51” corresponded to the same submission. That, however, is not the case: I find five submissions in the database that reference “fr51”. Four of those five submissions report the same MD5 hash, indicating that they were taken on the same device using the same browser and the same connection — the remaining submission has a different MD5 hash. I don’t know whether it’s something unexpected for your collection method
Jeremy